WEIMI INSIGHTS / ASSORTMENT DECISIONS
Use a small, documented assortment test to distinguish genuine customer demand from availability and placement effects.
BASELINE
Know what the selection did before the change.
AVAILABILITY
Make sure the trial product was actually on sale.
DECISION
Agree what evidence will justify keeping it.
A useful product trial changes a limited part of the range and records availability, sales and service effects over a representative operating period.
01 / BUYER NOTES
Decide what the new product is meant to improve. It might fill a missing pack size, offer a different flavour or serve a request from regular customers. A clear question helps you select a comparison instead of treating every sale as proof that the trial worked.
Keep the initial change small. Replacing many products, moving them and changing prices at the same time makes the result hard to interpret. Record the previous selection, its price and recent availability before the new item goes live.
02 / BUYER NOTES
Test the package with the machine and approve its product mapping, description and price. A product that repeatedly jams or appears under the wrong image cannot receive a fair demand test. Resolve those issues before using its sales performance to make an assortment decision.
Check the supply and shelf-life requirements. The product must be available to replenish during the test, and the service route must support it. Record supplier minimums and waste exposure so a popular item does not look attractive while creating an unmanageable stock commitment.
03 / BUYER NOTES
Choose a period that represents ordinary use at the site. Holidays, special events or an office closure can distort the comparison. Record these conditions rather than quietly treating an unusual week as normal demand.
Track in-stock time as well as units sold. A product that sells out early cannot be compared directly with one available throughout the period. Also look at neighbouring products: the new snack may replace an existing purchase rather than add another one.
04 / BUYER NOTES
Review sales, contribution after relevant costs, waste, refill effort and customer feedback. Avoid selecting a winner based on revenue alone when package size, purchase cost or spoilage differs. Keep the calculation consistent with the business’s normal accounting approach.
Set a clear next step: retain, adjust, extend the trial for a stated reason or remove the item. Document the decision so the team does not repeat the same inconclusive experiment later. If you change placement or price, treat that as a new test condition.
Record: The question, previous product, price and comparison period.
Check: Package performance, supply and correct machine setup.
Record: Sales, in-stock periods, waste and unusual site events.
Check: Whether the customer could actually buy the item.
Record: The decision and the evidence behind it.
Check: Effects on nearby products and the service workload.
PRACTICAL ANSWERS
Long enough to cover representative trading conditions and obtain useful observations. The appropriate period depends on site traffic and the question being tested.
Placement affects the result. Use a deliberate position and record it so the decision reflects the conditions under which the item was offered.
It is useful evidence, but check the starting quantity, time available, margin, waste and effect on the rest of the range before deciding.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Share your intended products and how often you expect to review them. Ask how package changes, selection mapping and stock reports are handled so assortment trials remain practical.
Explore equipment →Discuss your requirements →