WEIMI INSIGHTS / QUOTATION COMPARISON
Two cabinets can mean shared controls, separate machines or a different storage layout.
LAYOUT
Identify what each cabinet contains.
SHARED PARTS
Locate controls, payment and customer collection.
OPERATIONS
Compare how stock and faults are handled.
“Single” and “double” are not complete technical specifications. Ask for a layout and function map before deciding whether two quotations describe comparable systems.
01 / BUYER NOTES
A double arrangement might be two independent machines, one main cabinet with an attached unit or a cabinet with two product areas. These designs can look similar in a catalogue image while behaving differently for the operator and customer. Start by asking for the proposed model identities and a labelled layout.
The quotation should state which physical units are included and which functions belong to each. Avoid converting “double” into an assumed doubling of capacity or sales. The amount of usable stock depends on the product configuration, while demand depends on the site and assortment.
02 / BUYER NOTES
Determine where a customer selects, pays and collects the product. A shared screen may present stock from more than one cabinet, while independent machines may require separate transactions. Neither approach is automatically better; the useful comparison is how it fits the expected shopping journey.
Test what happens when a customer chooses products from different areas. Confirm whether combined purchases are supported and how an unavailable item is shown. A two-cabinet photograph does not establish one-basket checkout, shared receipts or any other software function.
03 / BUYER NOTES
Give both suppliers the same proposed bottles, cans and snack packs. Ask for the quantity and selection layout that can be supported by the reviewed configuration. Comparing a standard catalogue capacity for one unit with a customised assortment in another will produce a misleading result.
Keep the number of selections separate from the number of units stored. More selection positions may support a wider range without increasing stock of the best-selling item. A useful comparison shows the product mix, reserve space and replenishment assumptions rather than one large capacity number.
04 / BUYER NOTES
Where cabinets share a controller, payment device or other component, ask what remains available when that component is unavailable. If the units are independent, identify which reports and service tasks must be handled separately. The purpose is to understand the operating boundary, not to assume either design is fault-proof.
Request a demonstration of the documented partial-failure behaviour. For example, one product area may be unavailable while another remains usable, or the complete station may need to stop. Record what actually happens for the proposed system instead of promising uninterrupted operation.
05 / BUYER NOTES
Overall width is only one part of a site fit review. Draw door opening, refill access, collection space, ventilation requirements and any separation between units according to the equipment instructions. A pair of cabinets that fits against a wall may still be impossible to service in that position.
Include delivery and assembly requirements. Confirm whether the system arrives as separate pieces, where any connection takes place and who is responsible for commissioning. Do not infer that a larger combined station can be brought through the same route as either cabinet individually.
06 / BUYER NOTES
Build a line-by-line comparison covering the included cabinets, payment hardware, software, installation responsibilities and ongoing charges that apply. Separate confirmed prices from items awaiting quotation. Two independent units and one linked system may allocate those costs differently.
Then compare the practical work: stock loading, price updates, reporting and support. If a shared function saves a task, demonstrate it in the actual software. If separate units improve flexibility, identify the specific relocation or service scenario. The final choice should reflect the venue’s needs rather than the label “double.”
Check: Separate payment and reporting arrangements.
Compare: Flexibility against duplicate operational tasks.
Check: Shared controls and supported peripheral scope.
Compare: Common dependencies and partial availability.
Check: Actual selection and collection layout.
Compare: Usable stock and service access.
PRACTICAL ANSWERS
Not necessarily. The actual product layout and usable positions determine capacity.
Only the confirmed integration establishes that. Test the proposed selection and checkout process.
They may offer flexibility, but dimensions, utilities and site requirements still need checking for each relocation.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Send the intended product list and site layout to WEIMI to request single and double options with their included functions identified.
Explore equipment →Discuss your requirements →